Skip to main content

Indie game storeFree gamesFun gamesHorror games
Game developmentAssetsComics
SalesBundles
Jobs
TagsGame Engines

This still doesn’t answer the question.

“Creative Commons” and “Royalty-Free” are not licenses, they are umbrella terms. There is no Creative Commons license that says “do whatever you want except resell it,” and RF is not a CC license at all.

Please specify the exact license (e.g., CC0, CC-BY 4.0, CC-BY-NC 4.0, etc.). If you can’t name one, then there is no defined license and I can’t legally use the material.

(-1)

Lmfao dude there is no licence code that exists for this. It's something that 99% of creators complain about. CC0 is the closest but that allows people to re-sell stuff. ALL the others require attribution. Look at any of the freely available stuff on here. it's called a Custom CC license. So I completely understand why it's CC0 but with no re-selling. Cuz there is no Code for that exact thing. YOU said so in your own comment. But hey. You do you. If you are too scared to use it... then don't. Have a nice day

Yes you are correct that its under a custom CC licence. But please, no need to be rude. I understand that developers need to be sure of the legality of their assets. I always Include a custom licence as to avoid confusion but this was just a quick little project that I wanted to share. My other packs are paid for so I want to cover all bases for them. It's my bad for not including my custom licence agreement. Which I have now done.

(1 edit) (-1)

I have added a PDF Licence Agreement to the download file. Its the complete custom Licence. I consider this matter closed

(3 edits)

Wait, so people can’t know the license until AFTER They’ve downloaded it? Also, why can’t you just state what license it’s under? That’s all I’m asking. Why do I have to download it? If it’s a custom license, you should at least make it public. Also, unless you’re a lawyer, you probably shouldn’t be writing your own license, as it can be easy to create implications you did not intend to have, or leave certain things vague.

Also, a custom license defeats one of the main purposes of standardized licenses like Creative Commons: people know what they mean without needing to read pages of legal text. If you want to allow commercial use but prohibit resale, CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 might be close to what you want, though “resale” itself is vague.