itch.io

The puppet didn’t lie. The puppet was a scout. The Scout’s testimony gives the distance between the specified Evil and the closest other Evil to it. The Scout’s mechanic is different from the hunter who is distance from self to nearest evil.

The scout gave testimony about the witch, who truly was one card away from #9, a demon.

(Caveat that the wretch can mess this calculus up, but not in this round)

Can you post a full screenshot? You seem to have one more evil to kill because…

#1: You do not have “the village is safe” popup yet which means there must be one more evil left to kill.

#2 Your villager count is 5, minus one for the puppet. So you have 4 real villagers. You have 6 apparent villagers on the board that I see, one of which is a doppelganger. That’s one too many unless you have a second outcast.

#9 medium appears to be evil, pointing at #2 who is a doppelganger. In that configuration 7, 8, 3, and 2 would all be telling the truth.

Not challenging, but the Stanley Parable-like joy of circumventing the narrator more than makes up for it. Another birb special!

Alright, exorcists, here’s a weird one for you. Lilis night attacked a real knight twice in a row, so I’ve got a full living 10 card village with a triplet of scouts and a triplet of mediums. Who has to go?

5 is the standard penalty for most villagers and outcasts. That’s almost all the characters.

2 when killing a drunk because the drunk acts like an evil and sometimes you can’t avoid spiking him trying to figure out who is actually evil.

9 for a corrupted knight

6 for a drunk disguised as a knight (special case)

∞ for a real bombardier

And Lilis subtracts 2 health every fourth flip which is why Lilis rounds can look a little weird healthwise.

This is from a run where I got 2 points lower than my max, but it should help.

There are no major errors in the gameplay logic right now (but the lack of tutorials is a problem, imho). People here are happy to sort what’s going on if you screenshot your game results.

The wretch is usually the culprit though for new players, fittingly enough.

Here’s an example of someone else’s problem with the wretch: https://itch.io/post/15061433

Puppet was a slayer, and a puppet slayer can still slay evils. They will slay their puppeteer or themselves. Puppets can also tattle on themselves as fortune teller, jester, bishop, empress, and witness.

The only time the puppet sabotages the ability of the card it is impersonating is puppet alchemist (always “I cured 0 corruptions”), puppet Baker (always “I was a baker” and no propagation), and puppet Knight (can be killed). Puppet confessor will be dizzy.

https://demonbluff.wiki.gg/wiki/Baker

I needed the wiki for the baker.

Basically the baker is a disease that propagates to one unflipped villager card every time a new baker is flipped until it hits a corrupted one. The corrupted one will transform, lie about what it used to be, but end the chain.

So it’s possible for a medium to say something like #7 is a real Knight, and then on flip #7 is a baker that says “I was a Knight” (or if corrupted lie and say “I was an Oracle.”)

“I am the original baker” is always a good, uncorrupted card, but may be a doppel.

Also alchemists who were bakered will still do their alchemy because alchemists are a round start ability, not an on flip ability.

Sometimes when there is a puppet, self-validation is the best strategy.

The only problem with puppet currently is a puppet knight does technically lie by saying “I can’t die.” That should be sneak changed on right click when knight is puppet as a freebie for anyone observant, like cabbage dreamer.

Puppet killing puppeteer ought to unlock a backstabbing-themed skin, imo.

Kinda like Lost in Lampyrid Fog, the puzzles are great and very responsive, the atmosphere is charming, but the platforming is painful and more annoying than fun.

In the upper right, there is a list of the characters that might appear in the round and you can right click to learn how their abilities work. Some like Wretch (always good so never kill, but seen as a truthful but evil minion by truthful characters) can cause unexpected behavior.

The rest is logic.

If you have Poisoner (+1 Corrupted villager adjacent to Evil) and Baa (Don’t know which outcast will be in play), and a choice between Drunk and Wretch for the one outcast and no wretch appears on flip, then you expect 4 total lies - one drunk, one corrupt, and 2 evils. At least two liars have to be adjacent. Then you plot out possible scenarios that would make the board consistent with 4 liars (if X is a lying evil, this guy must also be a liar).

Then you kill someone suspicious (unless you kill a bombardier or you are in a Lilis round, you get a “free” kill) and find out if you logicked wisely. If you were wrong, there’s a good chance you can use the new information (dead cards reveal if they were truthful or corrupt) to pivot into the correct solution, especially if you didn’t tap all the character abilities.

Also you can use dead character abilities, even if they were evil, which helps.

For some reason my saves don’t save for this game anymore, but I will have to give it a try!

I think I just had the best round of demon bluff from a pure logic standpoint. This feels like the purest single game you could play to test if you know the rules.

8 would have been the perfect opening strike because drunk and demon must be double claiming the same role, and 3 and 5 would both have to lie if 4 was evil and only one of them could be poisoned.

There’s no backtracking away from the bear. You can get the solution with the abilities you have, but it’s a bit of a difficulty curve jump straight from yellow rabbit.

If anyone wants my opinion about the "smoothest" route learning mechanics wise, I suggest...

Orange Fox ▶ Yellow Rabbit ▶ Purple Squirrel ▶ Red Bear ▶ Green Deer ▶ Cyan Otter ▶ Blue Owl

My first run, I wound up missing orange fox and going straight to yellow squirrel to red bear to cyan otter. I would not recommend that.

By elimination, yep. The other rabbits at least tried to use their powers, even if they weren’t skilled enough succeed. Beast master is so scared they pretend someone else has their power.

This is a good one! Maybe par of slightly less than architect (but def less than oracle) because of the specificity but it doesn’t combine with any existing character role which keeps the balance.

Maybe the dancer should name one odd and one even Evil if you wanted to increase the potency a bit. (Puppet is Odd, Puppeteer is Even) (No even evils and no odd evils would be pretty helpful if that happened, which might be too OP.)

Here’s that hundred village streak validated on one account. (Sorry it took me while, roadtrip!) I discovered a new nitpick. If you save enough villages, the total number in the all saved villages tab on the left goes too close to the edge for those wide numbers.

So what is fury status, exactly? Does it do the max possible damage for an item? (I see it gets rid of items, but does it do anything else?)

I should have screenshotted to confirm. I don’t recall now.

Great Update! There are punchy gloves now on the apparent character exclusives. Oh no, garbage items! You threw off my Deck duplicator groove! (Still bought two!)

And I finally saw Doc again! I forgot how tricky he is, especially with that one full heal that you have to freeze or lose a universe to.

Is his primal first aid supposed to do anything if his HP is not at 1? He still healed even though I had Exclusion Principal to make sure he didn’t have a 1 universe.

Canceling is not really using an ability. It would be a bit silly to include a loophole like that.

A victory isn’t legit until it is all on one account, and I bet someone else can verify before I do! I’ll work harder for that screenshot proof, and good luck on the Q1 launch schedule!

My endless streak, split between my login and unlogged-in cookies is now 100 villages in a row, so I am now comfortable having even more opinions.

---

More Bugs Observed

Oracle mode bug. The flip-order tracker should not reset after executing a character.

Text off screen.

Pooka Frequency Check? I like Pooka in my endless games, but I seem to get the true fluffiest evil 50% more than Baa. Goat guy seems under-represented.

---

Playstyles

All minion games. I don’t mind the demons, but it would be nice to regularly have all-minion games in hard mode to mix it up a little. The minions have a greater range of disguise and slightly more chaotic abilities on average so they are quite challenging.

---

Wording Fixes

Small fix to Medium. The medium should say “#3 is actually a doppelganger” instead of “#3 is a real doppelganger” to match the better phrasing of the drunk.

Evil Hover text. The Evil hover text has a few grammatical oddities. Maybe change it to “Character alignment. Eliminate all Evils to save the village. Evils Lie and Disguise, unless specific rules say otherwise.”
(Current text is “Character Alignment. Eliminate them. Most often Lie and Disguise. Eliminate all Evil to save the village.”) IMO, the plural noun “Evils” as a shorthand for “evil characters” is trivial to understand, used consistently in other parts of Demon Bluff, and fits the gamelike context.

Alchemist Activation. Alchemist’s card should mention that his ability triggers at the start of a match when he is still facedown after evils and outcasts have acted because he is a violation of the typical rule that most abilities trigger on flip.

Chancellor and Puppet. It would be helpful to note somewhere that Outcast and Evil numbers in the upper right Villager/Outcast/Minion/Demon tracker don’t reflect the totals in game because of these characters’ abilities.

Minor plurals. It’s the littlest of nitpicks, but 1 minion and 0 demons in the upper left tracker would be correct.

---

Outcast-related deck bloat

Hard games generally have one too many possible outcasts in the play deck. This makes Baa completely meaningless as a demon.

For instance, a 6 Villager, 1 Outcast, 2 Minions, 1 Demon game with Chancellor, Minion, and Pooka has 15 cards in the play deck (9 villagers (6 real + 3 potential disguises), 4 outcasts, 3 evils) for 10 cards on the field. The play deck should only have 3 outcasts to account for the one chancellor will add, and a possible outcast disguise.

In a 9 card game with Witch and Pooka and 2 outcasts, 4 outcasts show up in the play deck. In this type of game, I would expect play decks that alternately have 2 or 3 outcasts, varying the uncertainty.

Fixing the outcast deck bloat would make hard games marginally easier on average because of uncertainty reduction, but it benefits players who like more logical approaches as opposed to stab-and-find-outers (like me!). You could have a mix of both, too.

Baker. The baker is a benefit & drawback flawed character like an outcast, but they can’t be listed as one because their ability wouldn’t work. That said, internally, I really think the baker should be treated as an outcast for frequency purposes. Remove one outcast from the game if a baker is going to show up.

---

Even more characters that could be in the game

Gardener

(Villager, Good) (↶) Pick 1 character: Learn how many evils were still facedown after the selected card was first flipped over. [NO NIGHT REFRESH! BUT MAYBE NOCTURNAL REFRESH.] Hint: Oracle Mode numbers cards by the order they were originally flipped in.

Lazybones

(Outcast, Good) Disguises as a Villager or Outcast with an (↶) activating ability. Trying to use their ability reveals Lazybones’ true identity.

(↶) Select two/three cards from the pop-up deck of eligible roles. Lazybones randomly disguises as one of those characters and can use their ability. Hint: Truthful villagers always see Lazybones as Lazybones and an Outcast.

[The ability is Lazybones running off to the neighboring village to borrow someone else to do their job! And the eligible roles might be the villagers in the current deck, or cards that are less powerful. Lazybones keeps the yellow outcast card border when it borrows a new role as a reminder of what they are.]

[A card to throw off careful player calculus, but give them an opportunity to try to pick a custom villager in recompense.]

Nocturnal

(Outcast, Good†) Game Start: I disguise as a Good Villager currently in play. I am initially Good and Truthful.

If a Good character is Executed, I turn into a Lying Evil Demon that must be Executed! (Note: Evils who slay Goods do not turn Nocturnal.)

Hint: When Nocturnal turns Evil, cards with abilities that refresh during a Night Cycle instantly renew. Previous statements and actions Nocturnal made while Good are still seen as truths, but any new ones after a turn will be Lies.

“A sinister and restless bloodline, reawakened by innocent blood spilt.”

[A card to share the game with a drunk or doppelganger, best friend of the Chancellor. Might also need the ability to reactivate any one living card’s power if there are not enough night refresh roles on the board. I think disguising as a card not in play like a usual demon is a bit too tricky when there is corruption everywhere.]

Ghul

(??? Evil) If there are no dead characters, lose 1 health on every other card flip, starting with Flip 1. (e.g. 1,3,5,7,9)

[Not sure if this would be better or worse in play than the other one health lost per flip baddie with reduced penalty I suggested below. The goal is to encourage strategic flipping and early risk-taking. Should not show up with Lilis or any other health subtractors. (Although I think of Lilis as a slightly stronger Witch, like Pooka is a stronger Poisoner, and doesn’t need extra bleed damage because losing a good villager selectively is its own penalty.)]

6 damage.

My understanding is that, internally, the math goes like this:

5 dmg [standard penalty for innocent execution] 
+ 
4 dmg [corrupted knight penalty] 
+ 
-3 dmg [drunk anti-penalty]
=
6 net penalty

The wretch catches a lot of people because they are used to thinking of the wretch as a safe, good character because no evil ever disguises as them.

But remember the wretch is seen as a random evil minion (it might change within rounds) by everyone but a truthful dreamer, who sees them as a cabbage. That means Lilis won’t kill a wretch on a first night because she thinks they are an ally, for instance.

In this case, the oracle thought the wretch was a poisoner, which immediately validated the oracle as truthful (albeit kinda useless, lol).

It also means you have to be more careful with hunter’s testimony because “poisoner” could be the real poisoner or the wretch.

[there should be a healing item for low universe runs]

“Miracle” heals (if I recall) five HP in the universe of your choosing, which IMO is generally more useful the fewer universes you have. It occurs to me that I could have the shop be more likely to stock items that it thinks are more useful to your current run, which might be necessary given how “bloated” the item selection has become.

The thing about those single universe target items is they take up a whole deck slot. I feel like there a sweetspot that is “Once per floor, pay 4 energy for 20 healing divided evenly across all universes you have, rounded down.” So if you have a four universe run, it’s super nifty, but a waste of a card in many universe situations.

---

Agree with your logic on wave collapse. It helps with the fun.

And also agreed on adjusting the shop inventory to match your current situation!

The Baker chains so long as the new Baker’s original role is not corrupted.

If not corrupted, the first Baker flipped (or Doppel baker) truthfully says “I am the original Baker”. It then targets a still facedown villager card to become a baker, who when flipped will try to baker another villager, creating a chain. The chain breaks if a baker tries to target a corrupted character, who will turn into a baker but lie about what their original role was and will not baker any more facedown cards.

A puppet who was a baker will claim “I was a baker.”

The strat in the game you just played would have been to shank the confessor, since there are no outcast disguisers to worry about (so bomby is real). If the confessor was corrupted because the poisoner was nearby (only 1 corruption in this game and they must be next to the poisoner), the poisoner must be the #5 baker claiming medium because 7 was telling the truth. And Baa would be the dreamer because demons can’t be the same role as a villager and the other bakers are clear.

Of course, shanking the confessor would have revealed Baa, meaning 7 was lying and you could validate the dreamer on Baa to reveal the dreamer was also lying. Then it becomes a fifty-fifty choice about who to shank (you still have 10 health, so you win).

Sometimes the best strategy is to figure out potential solutions and then spend the free kill on someone suspicious you think you would break the conundrum.

This is also why Baker games are tricky because the jester and medium might have given you more and better information.

I enjoyed the main quest and the three lantern hunt, but not even the path of observation let me escape the jarring gameplay switch, so I decided to call it a game with the standard ending.

Also the GUI navigation is a bit clunky. Not having a backscroll between clues, having to hit the inventory every time to light a candle rather than just having a hotkey for each item, or letting you shortcut by just X to interact once you have the useful item. And the clue to the green location should have probably been a collectable, so you wouldn’t have to memorize how it was done.

The cannon puzzle was excellent. I might have labelled each of the candles in the lighthouse puzzle with the symbol of their lighthouse to reduce backtracking later.

It might be tricky to implement because it seems like a strong role, but a Gardener who says some variant of [if there are evils / X number of evils are / a specific evil is] still facedown when revealed might be interesting, and helpful in any kind of flipping is a limited resource game. This would also help tutorialize oracle mode’s flip tracker.

You could have a barkeep do the same (or a bit better) for outcasts (to keep track of that darn drunk! And to know if Lilis swatted my doppel or doc!).

The math works out that you can get 8 extra dollars in play if you keep it alive the whole game. I feel like progressively making it more expensive is the best strat so when you are really cash strapped at the beginning you can try to farm it, but if you just want to gamble for points at the end, you better be confident.

I’ve tried nubby a half dozen times, and even with aggressive healing and the tactic you suggested, there is enough chaos that the dollars invested probably pans out less than 50% of the time. Kobold, that guy with Silence, and the Knight pretty heavily punish low HP and right-side universe situations and it is pretty common to get one of them, so you have to keep investing on healing. I’ll buy a nubby before a final fight if I think I can roll over boss (e.g. I’ve got EMP and some other shield game vs. Princess), but I’d rather reroll most days.

Maybe the balance with sword and shield is to only add shield if you don’t have more than one or two.

Re. Wave Collapse, I feel like there is a conundrum. If you don’t invest in attack items because you are doing a status or shield flip type run, it is pretty hard to win without it because you are in rounds for so long because your attack is flat out bad with the defaults. Going without it on non-attack runs feels like a punishment for attempting any sort of ‘creativity.’ And part of the problem with that is many of the other healing items are pretty situational - if the healing situation were more balanced, wave collapse could be better regulated. And I’m not really sure how to approach that without a lot of tweaking and playtesting.

If you go gangbusters on attack items and shuffles, wave collapse lets you coast. I feel like the balance would be to reduce frequency/increase cost of wave collapse if too many attack items or increase frequency/decrease cost if you purchase more status items and are clearly going for something kind of “off brand.”

Ultimately I’d rather play a fun game than a perfectly balanced game, and wave collapse works in that direction. And the runs that I remember most fondly were probably my first or second run where it came together right away where I had poison and flip and could nab shields, and that one absolutely bonkers run where I think I somehow lootboxed a second deck duplicator (I really wish you could see what you bought at the end of a run because I wish I could verify what I did for that one - I was still learning the ropes.) and wound up with 46 energy.

But one way I would balance wave collapse is to make sure you can’t have more than one, even with deck duplicator.

---

But mostly, I think the biggest missing item right now is a healing item that gets more effective when you have fewer universes. That would truly make those low universe runs viable, playing close to the edge.

Its pair would be an item that heals if you lost a universe in the current round.

Highest scoring round documented: 4 Evils Killed in 5 flips, zero mistakes.

Characters that could be in the game (Part 1)

• Cosmetician (Villager, Good). Pick 2 characters: Learn if any of them is Disguised. “Is #1 or #2 Disguised? True!” (Aka a Medium-Teller)

• Fixed dreamer. (Villager, Good). Pick 2 characters: Learn which Evil roles they are NOT. Hints: If Lies: If Evil picked, learn correct info. “#1 couldn’t be: Puppet. #2 couldn’t be: Puppeteer”

• Snatcher (minion, Evil) - Swaps bodies with one Villager, which counts as a Disguise. The Villager replaced by the Snatcher truthfully tells how many cards away the Snatcher is from another specific Evil (or themselves if another evil is not in the game). Lies and Disguises. Tip: Truthful villagers aren’t fooled by the swap. Executing the Snatcher cures the villager of all evil influences and allows their abilities to be used.
  A deliberately easier minion, to pair with nastier ones. You know the snatched card is good from the start, like a confessor.

• Grave Robber (minion, Evil) - While alive, dead characters do not reveal their true identities or if they were corrupted. Reveal after the Grave Robber is killed. Lies and Disguises.
  All you learn is if you slew an evil or not by watching the evils remaining counter. I would match Snatcher with “strong character” games that have empresses and bishops (and oracles and knitters) and puppeteers and puppets. As I got better at playing, sometimes the best opening move was to “validate” a suspicious empress or bishop by killing them. This would take away a useful tool without being too wretched about it.

• Vampire (demon, Evil, Night Cycle refresh) - While alive, subtracts 1 health on every flip. The penalty for wrongful executions decreases by 3 for the duration of the round. Lies and Disguises.
  Even with an average of only 2 for a wrongful kill penalty, decreased to encourage more early risk-taking killing, you still can’t afford the free kill if you don’t work fast and are picky about what you flip. Better in games with more strong characters and fewer evils. Remove the -2 health mechanic on Lilis. (Or make Lilis this card, and the night killer the Vampire.)

On Ascension 15, and I’ve played about 180 rounds total, so I feel I can have opinions.

---

Overall

• Solid interface, sounds, and art on desktop. All the core game behaviors work well and are inviting.

• I would like more tutorialization. The new roles pour in too quickly in standard to get a handle on them. The way I would implement this is a tutorial mode from the main menu for each type of character with 3-5 rigged rounds that showcase behaviors and rules intersections. As new characters come into play, unlock more games for the same character.

• Tags could be improved. I used them heavily, but the options were insufficient. I would split the colored tags into labels that you can apply one each of Set 1 (Good, Evil, (Unknown)) and Set 2 (Truth, Lie, (Unknown)).

---

Bugs observed

• The web version sometimes fails to clear out some old cards, causing a double layered card effect with fake cards over the real ones. Touching oracle mode solves it.

• Postgame summary sometimes shows wrong draw order. While hovering gets you some info, it doesn’t show the identities of face down cards Lilis killed, which would be handy.

• Dead evils in Lilis rounds who disguised as renewable characters don’t have their abilities renew.

---

Characters I think work well:

• Bard - Not quite as useful as the scout, but feels balanced.

• Bishop - Potentially the strongest role in the game because they are useful when either lying or truthful. There’s always two good characters among their description. Sometimes a board is such that the strongest opening move is to kill the bishop to validate potential IDs, especially if there is a drunk in play. That doesn’t mean nerf because I need some strong roles that call out other characters specifically to balance some of the underwhelming ones.

• Confessor - Strong in a game with limited corruption, weaker in a game with corruption but useful for being a target of abilities. Overall well balanced.

• Druid - Useful for drunks and fake bombardiers, and can very reliably self-validate in most games if not useful.

• Empress - Potentially the second strongest role in the game because they are useful when either lying or truthful. Especially useful when lying in high evil number games. That doesn’t mean nerf because I need some strong roles that call out other characters specifically to balance some of the underwhelming ones.

• Enlightened - Well balanced, not a dominating role like empress, but often helps clinch.

• Fortune Teller - Deceptively simple in a good way. Using the fortune to simply self validate with known goods is often less valuable than trying to use it as a select-target gemcrafter, with one known good and one unknown that will break a conundrum in one kill. Very strong in Lilis rounds since the first Lilis kill is never(?) a wretch so you have a known good to play with.

• Gemcrafter - Basic ability, better when lying. Solid role.

• Hunter - Surprisingly strong.

• Judge - Basic ability with thoughtful use cases, simpler to use than fortune teller and combines well with it.

• Knight - A weaker card. The occasional free kill and ability to validate don’t make up for the low grade bombardier liability in a corruption round. I like it for the same reason as bombardier though - it feels like a gamble you have to work up to. Also looks like a Link to the Past Link.

• Knitter - Low key one of my favorite cards because of how effective it is in early game, in just about every type of game, lie or truth. It isn’t in your face powerful like empress or bishop, but clutches more frequently than I expect.

• Lover - a solid card, rarely feels useless, not OP.

• Medium - more powerful when lying and often clinches corruption games.

• Oracle - strong card, with the likes of Empress and Bishop

• Scout - love child of the knitter and hunter. Also surprisingly strong.

• Slayer - great for taking an early-game risk, balanced with the intrigue added when killing often doesn’t work. I would have never anticipated Grocery Store Brand Geralt would be balanced as well as he is.

• Wretch - Favorite outcast because it doesn’t time bog rounds with more “if X, then Y”.

• Doppelganger - A well balanced outcast that makes it harder to spot minions, but guarantees a truth teller in its pair.

• Drunk - Adds drama and intrigue, but too much intrigue if a drunk and plague doctor are in the same game with another corrupter.

• Lilis - The refresh ability mechanics need to be prominently introduced somewhere. Lilis rounds add lots of tension in a good way, especially when those refresh roles come up. I would do away with the -2 health every kill. It can raise the tension if there is a drunk in the same game, but it doesn’t add a lot.

• Poisoner, Pooka, Chancellor, Puppeteer, and Puppet - I REALLY like the evils that have location-based mechanics. They work well, especially with limited reveal games. Puppet’s strange honest mechanic works well because of this.

• Minion and Twin Minion - Simple, but a breath of fresh air in games where there are drunks and Plague Doctors.

• Shaman - cool ability, interesting in games with doppelganger.

---

Characters I have no particularly strong feelings about

• Architect - I prefer the relative direction characters over this global option role more. All the characters can often occasionally clinch the game, but I feel like the architect underperforms.

• Plague doctor - I have strong feelings, but they resolve to net neutral. Doc is useful and interesting, but playing a round with them takes longer. The corruption snipe across the board adds the most intrigue of any character in game, so I have to do a lot more work to hash out truth-lie combo possibilities. The most common role that makes me reset games because I don’t want to take that long. I had a streak of about 10 games in a row without the doc, corruption, not corruption, and frankly I didn’t miss him too much. I guess my net feelings are too much of him is annoying.

• Jester - Clunky. I finish a lot of rounds without tapping it.

• Poet - Seems like a card to rig rounds to have duplicate/not-in-play villagers. Fine by me, but I don’t like that I need to have all the mimicked-cards memorized because there is no place in game to reference rules for cards not in play. Otherwise a fine card.

• Witness - Rarely comes up so I haven’t developed an opinion. I wonder if the frequency is bugged. Maybe I am just unlucky.

• Bombardier - Occasionally results in “flip a coin not to die” logic forks which are sometimes avoidable by plotting ability use better. I like bombardier’s drama, but I can’t put it in “works well” because it can kill a round through no fault of the player. I screenshotted an example of this.

• Witch - Kind of boring. Witch’s can’t reveal last card should be changed to “Witch turns the last card flipped into animal. Kill the witch to change them back. (Animal cards don’t count as flipped for score purposes)” Looking at a facedown card is boring. It would be a lot more interesting to see a pig, or newt, or llama, or dog, or cat, or something.

• Baa - Adds uncertainty about drunk and doppelganger and disguise as outcast games. Does its job as intro demon.

---

Characters I like less because they tend to be obnoxious

• Alchemist - Often not useful, most useful when he does nothing. Ability is underwhelming. I often find myself in a conundrum with him where there a choice between assuming he acted, or him lying about it (Pooka has a wide sweep), and thus he’s not useful to early game logical eliminations until I kill someone, and by then other roles will have allowed be to make a better judgment call. It’s actually problematic that he shows up so often with the plague doctor because the plague doctor’s ability to snipe across the board makes him far more tenuous to trust vs maybe being adjacent to other liars. And him not doing anything about the drunk to add even more uncertainty is just a napalm skunk thrown on the dumpster fire.

• Baker - They feel like a gimmick. The behavior is really bizarre compared to previous characters so the baker is stressful in a “I don’t really know how this character’s ability works so I don’t know how to gain useful info from it” sense when they first start appearing. By the time I got used to them, I wound up hoping they lie because that’s more useful than the baker chaining to overwrite more useful character roles. I sometimes reset baker games that don’t have enough corruption causing sources.

• Dreamer - The least useful villager role, even in Lilis games with the night refresh. Can’t really validate anyone but themselves, and only after an evil kill or if wretch is in the game. This character needs a buff or to be done away with - the only role I have feelings this strong about. I’d rather Dreamer only show up in 3+ evil games and eliminate an evil possibility, e.g. “Can’t be Pooka”. (“Pick 2 characters: Learn which Evil role they aren’t. If Good picked, learn random info. Hints: If Lies: If Evil picked, learn correct info. “#1 couldn’t be: Puppet. #2 couldn’t be: Puppeteer”)

Having played through more than a hundred times now, mini-bandaid should be cheaper by 1. Pretty much all the healing items are better.

Sword and Shield should be a repeatable item, not one use. It’s technically worse than knife which does 2 damage since it contributes less towards ending a round.

Nubby universes are too expensive towards the beginning. They have to survive a while to be worth it.

I wonder if final boss Doctor’s frequency is bugged. I get him a lot less than Medusa or Princess.

---

I just now discovered infinite money mode exists so I can play test hands.

I think the cheapest hand I can consistently beat the game with is Dagger, Wave Collapse, Icy Breath, Recycle, Auto Energy (to make deck duplicator’s frequency increase), Deck Duplicator. I got about all of those (subbing EMP for freeze) in one real run plus a few things I didn’t need and got 827.25. If you got lucky, picking up the quarter for each universe defeated, the ten dollar bill, and the blind for 5 I bet you could break 1000 points.

Lilis / Chancellor round with no corruptions and Chancy decides to live up to his name and disguise as a bombardier and sit by a real bombardier. No cards helpful to tell them apart. Luckiest round I will ever have.

I’m fairly well aware of the game mechanics at this stage. Getting there was frustrating, and now I realize it didn’t have to be. It became a lot less frustrating when I used the wiki.

There is quite a lot of nuance to the baker, such as when it hits a corrupted character and ends the chain, what the medium says about a villager before they get converted (and worse if the villager turned into a baker was corrupted then lies about their original role so you have the medium and the baker arguing), a doppel baker rebakering a baker, which I had happen. Does an alchemist’s ability trigger at flip (not this) or at game start after the evils/plague do their corruptions (this) so if he gets bakered, did his original cure ability work before?

There’s so many new roles appearing at this point, the player is still adjusting to a lot of things. It’s a lot to take in, without any low risk tutorialization to test understanding, or simply a tutorial mode where I can pick what cards are in play and try to get a run where the desired collision between rules happens so I can see how it plays out.

And it really sucks to lose a run because a 7-round ascension takes me forty-five minutes to an hour thirty if I am being somewhat careful/thoughtful and how far along I am.

---

I think the best way of handling it would have a mode of themed challenges for every role where the rounds are rigged to act as a tutorial. So you would have a baker-themed five village ascension challenge that runs through some of the weirder rules interactions.

Perspective from Ascension 8 (just so you know I’m not screwing up too terribly), what you are saying isn’t wrong, but the minimalism is frustrating and the wording isn’t great.

“Always Disguises as a unique villager, can not double-claim a good character.”

Should be

“Always disguises as a villager in deck but not in play, and never an outcast.”

“Double-claim” is jargon, and should be defined somewhere, and frankly is misleading because I’m pretty sure the drunk can double-claim with a demon.

I wish I could open a compendium and just see all the characters explained with a little more elaboration - “targets villager, not outcast, minion, demon”. Or have a face up test mode in the main menu to verify behaviors I’m not 100% sure about, like the baker’s propagation. With the judge-wretch example, my thought was, well, the wretch breaks the other villager’s judgments, so would the judge be fooled?

I have no idea what you mean by “renewing abilities”.

After Lilis murders someone in the night, several of the character powers can be used again: the Judge, the Dreamer, the Jester, and the Fortune Teller. Keep in mind it overwrites the last use so you have to write down what they said before. You might be able to off Lilis in time, or leave only Evil characters unflipped for the second night cycle.

When I figured that out, Lilis rounds became a lot less intense, although you sometimes get unlucky.